Trump All but Completes His Hostile Takeover of the GOP Pres Nomination: RIP Conventional Wisdom

Danger Shock Hazard

Trump’s win in Indiana coupled with Ted Cruz dropping out of the race all but ensures Trump’s eventual clinching of the GOP’s Republican Presidential nomination, leaving all the pundits who never fathomed such a scenario in their wildest dreams stunned, and scratching their heads.

This election cycle has been a perfect case study of why you shouldn’t trust the “experts” when it comes to making assessments/predictions. We’ve seen in the 2008/2009 market crash that the vast majority of political and economic “insiders” had no idea of that approaching crisis and certainly gave no warning to investors.

This time just about all the so called political guru’s completely missed the rise of Trump and his ability to stay afloat regardless of what he says no matter how inflammatory. They are flummoxed about his ability to withstand increased scrutiny and a biased assault of press related articles against him, attempting to write him off in hopes that the polling numbers would follow, which they didn’t.

Even worse, having missed the boat on predicting the ascendancy of Trump’s campaign, they have the audacity of now writing articles on explaining how this came to pass- like anyone should pay attention to the same folks that were completely oblivious  to his sustainability in the first place.

Simply psychology can explain the Trump phenomenon.  People are angry at Washington and the constant failure of their elected officials to live up to their promises. In their frustration they seek someone not yet “tainted” by the system that constantly overpromises and underdelivers. They are now ready to pick an outsider over the political insiders.

Trump remains on top due to his public persona of brashness/arrogance towards the establishment. The more he is attacked, the more he fits the role as the “rebel” of politics to all his supporters, which increases his appeal. It’s very similar to the daughter who is dating a “bad boy” and the more the parents admonish and scold her to let him go, the more attractive he becomes to her.

The “experts” ask, how can Trump supporters be so oblivious to all the negative things he has said as well as his past flip flops on opinions? Why doesn’t this exposure change their mind? The answer is they have made an emotional choice based on their resentment of their elected politicians as well as his positive message on better times ahead with bringing back outsourced jobs and good times in general, and are ignoring/rejecting anything else said, period. Back to the daughter/bad boy example- how many times will she be “persuaded” with a list of rational cogent reasons why the guy she is dating is a bad match? How many times have your parents persuaded you to change your mind after you became passionate/excited about something or someone?

The “experts” asked, why did Marco Rubio fail to beat Trump at his own game of childish attacks/insults? The answer is you can’t imitate someone’s “brand” and expect to beat them with it. It’s the equivalent to the school valedictorian/nerd taking off his suit/tie, and putting on a leather jacket to try to woo the daughter away from the bad boy. All that does is make you look like a “wannabe” as well as corrupts the “brand” you stood for.  Notice how Cruz and Kasich didn’t take the bait to go into the mud, and how they continued to poll higher than Rubio before he dropped out.

Now these “experts” are saying in 20-20 hindsight Rubio made a mistake in fighting Trump in the mud when they were the ones who suggested he should do it! The lesson here is to be true to yourself, or at least “appear” that way. =)

Tonight we know that not even the behind the scenes 3D Chess Level strategy of Ted Cruz or his team up with Kasich was enough to stop Trump’s growing momentum.

This election season is one for the history books – that a non political outsider could take out a field of seasoned elected professionals that were way more funded and entrenched in the system than he ever was, and ride a populist wave to the Republican nomination turns all conventional wisdom and expert analysis on its ear. We live in interesting times!

 

 

Senator Warren Calls Out The GOP SCOTUS Nomination Blockade

The GOP is taking their opposition to Obama to new heights with the decision to not hold any hearings for a Supreme Court nomination. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley are united in their stance to not hold any hearings until a new President is elected.

Some Republicans have attempted to argue that this type of blocking has been done in the past, but in reality this has never been done to a sitting president with close to a year left in office.

What this action does is basically nullify a President’s FULL last year in office, which is a subversion of the will of the people as well as the Constitution in the name of political gaming.

If this action is allowed to stand, it will set a new dark precedent in obstruction when it comes to mixed government. Every two years a “stunt” like this could be pulled  by either side with claims that major appointments and bills should be ignored until the election cycle is over. Our already hobbled government would function even worse than ever before.

It’s understandable why the GOP wants to avoid the nomination process- it poses high risk for GOP Senators in purple States if they vote against qualified candidates for no good reason. Meanwhile, their fellow Senators in hard-right leaning States fear getting the boot if they approve any pick from Obama. Those are indeed tough prospects to face, but it’s no excuse to just stop doing their job. All elections have consequences and one can’t just go on a work strike because the election results were not favorable.

 

Senator Elizabeth Warren provides her own scathing commentary on the damages of continued GOP obstruction:

 

 

Speaker of the House John Boehner Forced to Resign by Tea Party Wing- Why it’s a Big Deal

The GOP establishment has continually written off the power/influence of the Tea Party faction, but much like Trump’s “imminent demise”, it turns out to be more wishful thinking than reality.

When Eric Cantor, former Republican House Majority leader and once a Tea Party favorite, got challenged in his own primary and lost, that was a clear wake up call that Tea Party fervor was still in high gear. Now Speaker of the House John Boehner, publicly embarrassed time and time again for failing to establish a majority GOP House consensus on critical votes such as continued government funding, has elected to basically throw in the towel and step down rather than face ongoing resistance, rebellion, and rejection from the more conservative Tea Party House members.

This is how the news was received by conservative voters when Marco Rubio alerted the audience at the Value Voters Summit:

What’s amazing is that on an absolute scale, both Boehner and Cantor would be considered highly conservative – but they have been branded as weak RINOs by the far right Tea Party wing.

Boehner in particular has been excoriated by the Tea Party for failing to stop Obama’s and the Democrats initiatives such as the ACA (“Obamacare”).

When Boehner and Cantor basked in the 2010 victory that awarded House majority back to the Republicans, it’s likely they never dreamed that they would both be kicked out by their own party within five years.

The true irony is the establishment GOP sowed the seeds to their own demise right after the 2008 elections when the public was angry over the prospect of  a wrecked economy, continued government overspending and the prospect of bailing out Wall Street as well as Chrysler and GM. The GOP used the anger that put them into a minority and redirected it towards the government in general, and the Democrats in particular.

Their efforts to brand the entirety of big government as “evil” was a big success and many Dems got the boot in 2010. The problem is the new crop of politicians that were elected was based on this government hatred and were not willing to just fall in line to the status quo as Boehner and the GOP establishment had hoped. The GOP establishment didn’t think this through to realize that bringing in folks that hate the government will also target them as well as being part of the problem.

A good number of newly elected Republicans came in with a no compromise attitude and were put off by Boehner’s negotiating with the Dems instead of demanding their unconditional surrender. They were elected with the promise of taking immediate direct action against the Dems agenda such as Boehner’s and McConnell’s continuous chanting of the repeal and replacement of the ACA as a call to arms to energize and get out the Rep voters. Those newly elected were now primed for direct combat based on the promises made by their leaders.

This conflict has resulted in the US Debt Ceiling Crisis of 2011, where it appeared the GOP was willing to let the US Goverment go into default on its debt unless the Dems conceded to their budget cut demands. That brinkmanship led to S&P downgrading the country’s credit rating. Then there was the Government shutdown of 2013,  when the GOP tried to force the Dems to defund Obamacare as a condition for keeping the government running.

To sum up, much to the chagrin of Boehner and the rest of the GOP establishment, they are reaping what they sowed. The obvious lesson here is don’t make promises to your constituents for immediate action that you know you can’t deliver on. With Obama’s relection in 2012, the ACA is essentially protected by his veto power until he leaves office in 2017.

And here lies the problem that is the big deal. Boehner’s “sin” was attempting to operate within the rules of law and votes as mandated by the Constitution. The founding fathers created the structure of our government with the assumption that all parties would make an attempt to work together and establish points of compromise for the greater good of the country. However, compromise is seen as a dirty word in the Tea Party lexicon.

With Boehner’s departure, you can be sure the Tea Party’s next target will be Senate Majority Leader McConnell. They are trying to put pressure on him to get rid of the 60 vote threshold to move bills forward to a vote, which is ironic since the Reps enjoyed blocking Dems using the 60 vote rule when they were in the minority. Neither Rep or Dem Senate leaders want to remove the 60 vote rule for fear of what would happen if they fall into the minority.

The Tea Party has shown they are willing to take the country hostage and threaten US debt defaults and government shutdowns to get their way rather than win by conventional means like obtaining the required voting majorities in Congress to pass a bill and override a presidential veto.

The fact is no party can or should ever submit to folding under such ransom tactics as it would set the precedent for it to be repeated and majority elections would mean nothing when minority factions can bully their way into power.

Boehner leaving means the GOP is now that much closer to having an apocalyptic showdown with the Dems that will result in a prolonged government shutdown or even a US debt default, either of which would be very bad news for the economy and those that directly depend on the government, such as SS recipients and veterans.

It seems inevitable that the Tea Party will strive to see how much power they truly have and wind up overplaying their hand at the expense of both their party and country.

We now enter the next phase of the Tea Party Revolution going into political and economic uncharted waters…